Austinian model evaluation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Like Austin’s “performatives,” some models are used not merely to represent but also change their targets in various ways. This article argues that analysis can inform model evaluation: If evaluated with respect adequacy-for-purpose, and if performativity cases be regarded as a purpose (a proposition is defended, using mechanism design an example), it follows these “felicity,” whether use has achieved this purpose. Finally, I respond epistemic ethical concerns might block conclusion.
منابع مشابه
teacher educator evaluation model
اگرکیفیت معلم کلاس برای بهبودیادگیری دانش آموزحیاتی است،پس کیفیت اساتیددانشجو-معلمان، یابه عبارتی معلمین معلمان نیزبرای پیشرفت آموزش بسیارمهم واساسی است.ناگفته پیداست که یک سیستم مناسب آموزش معلمان ،معلمین با کیفیتی را تربیت خواهدکرد.که این کار منجربه داشتن مدارس خوب، ودرنتیجه نیروی کارماهرتروشهروندبهتربرای جامعه خواهدشد. اساتیددانشجو-معلمان نقشی بسیارمهم را در سیستم اموزش معلمان درسراسرجهان ای...
Reconciling Austinian and Russellian accounts of the Liar paradox
Introducing The Liar Barwise and Etchemendy's The Liar presents two accounts of the semantics of the liar sentence \this sentence is not true", named for Russell and Austin, and informed by situation semantics and non-well-founded set theory. The accounts diier over how a speaker uses a sentence and the world to express a proposition. \By a statement we will understand certain sorts of datable ...
متن کاملAustinian Ifs Revisited – and Squared Away with the Equivalence Thesis and the Theory of Conditional Elements
Austinian ifs are a relatively newly noticed linguistic phenomenon, dat ing only to 1951. This is in marked contrast to material implication, strict im pli cation, logical implication, and quantified conditionals, all of which were not only noticed but thoroughly discussed, if not fully systematically formalized, by the Greeks. Since 1951, and especially since 1961 when Austin's classic 1956 ...
متن کاملComparing Kirkpatrick’s original and new model with CIPP evaluation model
In a young field like educational programevaluation, it is inevitable that conceptualframeworks such as Kirkpatrick model arerevised with time and with greater knowledge.The New World Kirkpatrick Model (NWKM)is the new version of Kirkpatrick model whichis more welcome to context and process, andhence probably much closer to the context–input–process–product (CIPP) model (1). The aimof this pape...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy of Science
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0031-8248', '1539-767X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.24